Status: Finalised
First registered on:
07/10/2014
Last updated on:
16/09/2016
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS7626
Official titleA Postmarketing Noninterventional Cohort Study of the Safety of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) in Subjects 2 Through 17 Years of Age
Study title acronymFlu vaccine feedback study
Study typeActive surveillance
Brief description of the studyFollowing the introduction of the interim guidance on enhanced safety surveillance for seasonal influenza vaccines in the EU, the DSRU is conducting a post authorisation safety (PASS) non-interventional cohort study to determine the incidence of adverse events of interest (AEI) following vaccination with the nasal LAIV, Fluenz Tetra® in the authorised age range (children 2-17 years of age) during the 2014/2015 influenza season. The aim of the study is to rapidly detect a clinically significant change (compared to what was known or expected of the previous year’s influenza vaccine) in the frequency and/or severity of expected reactogenicity (local, systemic, or allergic reactions) after administration of nasal LAIV, Fluenz Tetra® in children 2 to 17 years of age that may indicate a potential for more serious risks as the frequency of exposure to the vaccine increases. Vaccinees will be recruited via the mass vaccination programme through GP practices and through the pilot schools vaccination programme. Patient outcomes, validated by GPs where appropriate, will be captured through questionnaires (received via surface mail or the study website) and coded onto the DSRU database. Patients or their guardians will be asked to complete a questionnaire at enrolment and another 14 days after vaccination. Approximately 200 vaccinees consented per age group: (i) 2 years to <5 years (ii) 5 to <11 years (iii) 11 to 17 years, will be recruited although enrolment will continue to ensure the target of a minimum of 100 vaccinees with completed data per age group is reached.
Was this study requested by a regulator?Yes: EMA
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
Not applicable
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicable
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Centre to which the investigator belongsDSRU
Department/Research group
Organisation/affiliationDrug Safety Research Unit
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Professor
Last name Shakir
First name Saad
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
Yes
NIHR CRN
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Not applicable (single centre)
Countries in which this study is being conducted
National study
United Kingdom
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed28/07/201428/07/2014
Start date of data collection03/10/201403/10/2014
Start date of data analysis
Date of interim report, if expected
Date of final study report27/02/201518/03/2015
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companiesMedImmune100
Charities
Government body
Research councils
EU funding scheme
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Lynn
First name Elizabeth
Address line 1DSRU
Address line 2Bursledon Hall
Address line 3Blundell Lane
CitySouthampton
PostcodeSO31 1AA
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)44-2380408600
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
Public Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Lynn
First name Elizabeth
Address line 1DSRU
Address line 2Bursledon Hall
Address line 3Blundell Lane
CitySouthampton
PostcodeSO31 1AA
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)44-2380408600
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
6. Study drug(s) information
Product NameFluenz Tetra
CountryUnited Kingdom
Substance INN(s)A/CALIFORNIA/7/2009 (H1N1) V REASS. NIBRG-121
A/TEXAS/50/2012 (H3N2)-LIKE STRAIN (A/TEXAS/50/2012, MEDI 237514)
B/MASSACHUSETTS/2/2012 (YAMAGATA LINEAGE)-LIKE STRAIN (B/MASSACHUSETTS/2/2012, MEDI 237751)
B/BRISBANE/60/2008 (VICTORIA LINEAGE)-LIKE STRAIN (B/BRISBANE/60/2008, MEDI 228030)
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)No
8. Population under study
Age
Children (2 - 11 years)
Adolescents (12 - 17 years)
Sex
Male
Female
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects600
Additional information
At least 200 patients will be recruited per age group: 2-4, 5-11, 11-17
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?No
Sources of data
Exposure registry
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Risk assessment
Primary scope : Risk assessment
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
To rapidly detect a clinically significant change (compared to what was known or expected of the previous year’s influenza vaccine) in the frequency and/or severity of expected reactogenicity [after administration of Fluenz Tetra® in children 2 to 17 years of age] that may indicate a potential for more serious risks as the frequency of exposure to the vaccine increases.
Are there primary outcomes?No
Are there secondary outcomes?No
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Cohort study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Yes
Please describe duration of follow up
Patients will be followed up for 14 days after vaccination with Fluenz Tetra.
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
Summary descriptive statistics of basic demographic information, patient characteristics, co-morbidities, concomitant medications and AEIs will be presented. Numbers of cases (frequencies) and incidence rates overall, by age group and by batch for each endpoint/recorded adverse event of interest will be included in the expedited summary report.
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
Not submitted
18. Study Results
Not submitted
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Conflict(s) of interest of
investigator(s)Not submitted
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documentsNot
submitted
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Not submitted
