Status: Finalised
First registered on:
30/06/2015
Last updated on:
21/08/2019
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS10122
Official titleEvaluation of the effectiveness of the abatacept (ORENCIA®) intravenous and subcutaneous formulation Patient Alert Cards in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a sample of European Economic Area countries
Study title acronym
Study typeObservational study
Brief description of the studyThe patient alert cards (PACs) for the use of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC)
formulations of abatacept are to be evaluated as part of the post-marketing commitment to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). Three epidemiological sub-studies will be conducted: a patient survey of understanding and implementation of the key messages in the abatacept
PACs, a health care professional (HCP) survey of understanding and implementation of the key messages in the abatacept PACs and a Clinical Outcomes Study using retrospective chart review to correlate clinical and safety outcomes with levels of understanding and implementation of the key messages in the PACs.
Was this study requested by a regulator?Yes: EMA
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
EU RMP category 3 (required)
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicable
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Centre to which the investigator belongsOXON
Department/Research group
Organisation/affiliationOxon Epidemiology Ltd.
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Dr
Last name Qizilbash, MBChB MRCP(UK) BSc MSc DPhil(Oxon.)
First name Nawab
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
No
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Multiple centres
In total how many centres are involved in this Study?40
Countries in which this study is being conducted
International study
France
Germany
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed05/10/2014
Start date of data collection15/10/2016
Start date of data analysis
Date of interim report, if expected
Date of final study report07/09/2017
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companiesBristol Myers Squibb100
Charities
Government body
Research councils
EU funding scheme
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Qizilbash MBChB MRCP(UK) BSc MSc DPhil(Oxon.)
First name Nawab
Address line 116 Upper Woburn Place
Address line 2
Address line 3
CityLondon
PostcodeWC1H 0AF
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)34-629846059
Alternative phone number44-2035744965
Fax number (incl. country code)
Public Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Qizilbash MBChB MRCP(UK) BSc MSc DPhil(Oxon.)
First name Nawab
Address line 116 Upper Woburn Place
Address line 2
Address line 3
CityLondon
PostcodeWC1H 0AF
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)34-913459395
Alternative phone number44-02037418054
Fax number (incl. country code)
6. Study drug(s) information
Single-Constituent (Substance INN)ABATACEPT
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)Yes
Rheumatoid arthritis
8. Population under study
Age
Adults (18 - 44 years)
Adults (45 - 64 years)
Adults (65 - 74 years)
Adults (75 years and over)
Sex
Male
Female
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects400
Additional information
80 healthcare professionals to participate in the healthcare professional survey
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?No
Sources of data
Web-based patient and healthcare professional surveys.
Retrospective chart review study using an electronic case report form.
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Effectiveness evaluation
Primary scope : Effectiveness evaluation
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the abatacept PACs by:
1. Assessment of the distribution, awareness, utilisation, utility, knowledge, comprehension and behaviour by patients and HCPs.
2. Correlation of measures of the distribution, awareness, utilisation, utility, knowledge, comprehension and behaviour reported by patients in the same patients.
Are there primary outcomes?Yes
Patient survey: proportion of correct responses to individual questions about receipt, knowledge, understanding and acting on the advice contained in the abatacept PACs.
HCP survey: proportion of correct responses to individual questions about understanding and mplementation of key messages contained in the abatacept PACs.
Outcomes evaluation: proportion of infections leading to hospitalization.
Are there secondary outcomes?Yes
Patient survey:determinants of patient knowledge and understanding and implementation of the key messages.
HCP survey:determinants of HCP understanding and implementation regarding key messages.
Outcomes:mean time from infection to medical attention, proportion of: patients with results of tests to screen for tuberculosis/viral hepatits, emergency room visits, umplanned hospitalisation.
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Cross-sectional study
Healthcare professional survey, patient survey and retrospective chart review study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Not applicable/no follow-up
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
For the patient and HCP questionnaires, the percentage of patients/HCPs with responses to each question that indicate effectiveness of the PAC will be determined: receipt, awareness, usage, knowledge and comprehension of key messages. The primary endpoints of the patient survey responses indicating understanding and implementation will be analysed by baseline patient characteristics. The primary endpoints of the HCP survey responses indicating understanding and implementation of the PACs will be analysed by baseline HCP characteristics. Correlation between patients’ degree of understanding and implementation of the messages in the PACs with infections leading to hospitalisation and with other secondary endpoints will be studied through regression techniques.
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
Not submitted
18. Study Results
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Conflict(s) of interest of
investigator(s)Not submitted
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documentsNot
submitted
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Not submitted
