Status: Planned
First registered on:
01/11/2019
Last updated on:
05/11/2019
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS32142
Official titlePrescriber survey to evaluate the awareness to risk minimisation measures for mitoxantrone-containing medicinal products in the treatment of patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis associated with rapidly evolving disability
Study title acronym
Study typeOther: PASS Survey
Brief description of the studyIn this post- authorisation safety study (PASS) a survey will be used to obtain information on the understanding, knowledge and behaviour of treating (or intending to treat) physicians on the screening and monitoring requirement for with highly active relapsing MS patients, to minimise the cardiotoxic and malignancy risk associated with the use of mitoxantrone.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the awareness of the treating (or intending to treat) physicians on risk minimisation measures (RMMs) for patients with highly active relapsing MS associated with rapidly evolving disability, to minimise the cardiotoxic and malignancy risk associated with the use of mitoxantrone detailed in the EMs.
Was this study requested by a regulator?Yes: United Kingdom
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
EU RMP category 3 (required)
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicable
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Centre to which the investigator belongsIQVIA
Department/Research group
Organisation/affiliationIQVIA
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Dr
Last name Toussi
First name Massoud
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
No
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Not applicable (single centre)
Countries in which this study is being conducted
International study
France
Germany
Greece
Norway
Spain
Sweden
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed10/09/201923/09/2019
Start date of data collection03/07/2020
Start date of data analysis02/10/2020
Date of interim report, if expected
Date of final study report17/02/2021
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companiesMYLAN Inc100
Charities
Government body
Research councils
EU funding scheme
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Toussi
First name Massoud
Address line 1Tour D2
Address line 217 bis Place des Reflets
Address line 3
CityCourbevoie
Postcode92090
CountryFrance
Phone number (incl. country code)33-1413-51335
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
Public Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Toussi
First name Massoud
Address line 1Tour D2
Address line 217 bis Place des Reflets
Address line 3
CityCourbevoie
Postcode92090
CountryFrance
Phone number (incl. country code)33-1413-51335
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
6. Study drug(s) information
Single-Constituent (Substance INN)MITOXANTRONE
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)Yes
Relapsing multiple sclerosis
8. Population under study
Age
Adults (18 - 44 years)
Adults (45 - 64 years)
Adults (65 - 74 years)
Adults (75 years and over)
Sex
Male
Female
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects90
Additional information
This is a survey study where 90 physicians are requested to complete the survey on RMM for patients with highly active relapsing MS associated with rapidly evolving disability, to minimize cardiotoxic and malignancy risk associated with the use of mitoxantrone detailed in the EMs.
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?No
Sources of data
IQVIA OneKey database
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Risk assessment
Effectiveness evaluation
Primary scope : Effectiveness evaluation
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
The objective of this study is to evaluate the awareness of the treating (or intending to treat) physicians on risk minimisation measures (RMMs) for patients with highly active relapsing MS associated with rapidly evolving disability, to minimise the cardiotoxic and malignancy risk associated with the use of mitoxantrone detailed in the EMs.
Are there primary outcomes?Yes
The objective of this study is to evaluate the awareness of the treating (or intending to treat) physicians on risk minimisation measures (RMMs) for patients with highly active relapsing MS associated with rapidly evolving disability, to minimise the cardiotoxic and malignancy risk associated with the use of mitoxantrone detailed in the EMs.
Are there secondary outcomes?No
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Cross-sectional study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Not applicable/no follow-up
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
Categorical variables will be described as the total number and relative percentage per category. These will be the percentage per category.
In case of multiple-choice questions, the frequency of each option provided by the physicians will be reported in the statistical results. Different combinations of the answers provided will not be considered
CI of 95% will be evaluated, when relevant. Results will be weighted based on the real number of neurologists in each country as mentioned in OneKey lists.
The web questionnaire will be programmed to prevent the opportunity for participants to skip any questions. For each question associated to the outcomes included in the main objective, a criterion will be calculated to separate participants with an appropriate answer (or at least one appropriate response if the corresponding question allows multiple answers/true-false or is an open-ended question).
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
Not submitted
18. Study Results
Not submitted
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Conflict(s) of interest of
investigator(s)Not submitted
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documentsNot
submitted
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Not submitted
