Status: Ongoing
First registered on:
19/01/2016
Last updated on:
18/03/2020
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS12132
Official titleADDITION OF ANTIBIOTICS TO USUAL CARE MANAGEMENT OF ASTHMA EXACERBATIONS: A REAL-LIFE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS STUDY
Study title acronym
Study typeObservational study
Brief description of the studyAsthma exacerbations are major contributors to asthma morbidity and mortality (and related costs). Their management presents a major clinical need that is not adequately met by current approaches. Respiratory viruses (especially rhinovirus) are the most common causes of asthma exacerbations and may be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic asthma in children, but there are other factors can increase the risk/severity of exacerbations. Recently evidence suggests atypical bacterial infections (such as Mycoplasma pneumonia and Chlamydophila) may also contribute to exacerbation severity. A recent randomised controlled (RCT) trial of telithromycin in adult patients (n=278) with acute exacerbations of asthma found a significant reduction in asthma symptoms among patients receiving add-on telithromycin compared with placebo. The mechanism or mechanisms of action was/were not determined. A second recent open-label randomised study, evaluating the effect of clarithromycin in children (n=40) with acute asthma suggests its use as add-on therapy may offer benefit over standard exacerbation treatment alone. Children in the trial were randomized to receive 15mg/kg of clarithromycin for 21 days in addition to their regular (GINA-guided) exacerbation treatment. Children were followed up with diary cards for 12 weeks; lung function was assessed at entry and at 3 and 12 weeks post exacerbation. Compared with controls, children receiving clarithromycin had an increase in their number of symptom-free days, a reduction in the number and severity of days with loss of control following index episode, and a decrease in the duration of the initial asthma exacerbation. Lung function did not differ between groups. These RCT findings warrant further exploration in larger more representative adult and paediatric routine care populations.
Was this study requested by a regulator?Don't know
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
Not applicable
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicable
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Department/Research groupResearch in Real Life Ltd
Organisation/affiliationOPRI Pte Ltd
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Professor
Last name Papadopoulos
First name Nikolaos
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
Yes
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Not applicable (single centre)
Countries in which this study is being conducted
National study
United Kingdom
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed29/01/201601/01/2017
Start date of data collection15/02/201601/07/2017
Start date of data analysis
Date of interim report, if expected
Date of final study report12/10/2016
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companies
Charities
Government body
Research councils
EU funding scheme
OtherRespiratory Effectiveness Group100
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Professor
Last name Papadopoulos
First name Nikolaos
Address line 1Centre of pediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Human Development
Address line 2University of Manchester
Address line 3
CityManchester
Postcode
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)4401223967582
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
Public Enquiries
Title Professor
Last name Papadopoulos
First name Nikolaos
Address line 1Centre of pediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Human Development
Address line 2University of Manchester
Address line 3
CityManchester
Postcode
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)4401223967582
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
6. Study drug(s) information
Not applicable (disease/epidemiology study)
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)Yes
Asthma
8. Population under study
Age
Children (2 - 11 years)
Adolescents (12 - 17 years)
Adults (18 - 44 years)
Adults (45 - 64 years)
Sex
Male
Female
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects50000
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?Yes
Data sources registered with ENCePP
Sources of data
Routine primary care electronic patient registry
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Effectiveness evaluation
Primary scope : Effectiveness evaluation
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of managing asthma exacerbations with oral steroids alone versus combination antibiotics and oral steroids in paediatric and adult asthma populations.
Secondary objectives of the study will be to explore the differential usage and associated outcomes of different classes of antibiotics, as used in this context.
Are there primary outcomes?Yes
1a. Primary care consultations coded for asthma / wheeze
1b. Primary care consultations coded for asthma / wheeze resulting in an antibiotic prescription
1c. Primary care consultations coded for asthma / wheeze resulting in an oral steroid prescription
1d. Primary care consultations coded for asthma / wheeze resulting in both an antibiotic and an oral steroid
Are there secondary outcomes?Yes
2a. Primary care consultations coded for asthma / wheeze resulting in a prescription for a short-acting bronchodilator (SABA)
2b. Consultation for asthma / wheeze resulting in a SABA
2c. Hospitalisations for lower respiratory complaints
2d. Accident & Emergency (A&E) / Emergency Room (ER) attendance for lower respiratory complaints.
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Observational, historical database study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Not applicable/no follow-up
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
Matching, often used to minimise potential confounding by severity, will not be possible as it would required matching on multiple events per person.
Three potential options have been identified:
• Approach 1: a repeated measurements analysis
• Approach 2: a survival analysis considering time to event following the index event, (for all events).
• Approach 3: using each patient as their own control to evaluate different time to next event for patient depending on their index prescription (e.g. comparative time to next event for each patient when prescribed oral steroids only versus oral steroids + antibiotics).
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
Available when the study ends
18. Study Results
Not submitted
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Conflict(s) of interest of
investigator(s)Not submitted
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documentsNot
submitted
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Not submitted
