Status: Finalised
First registered on:
07/12/2017
Last updated on:
05/08/2020
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS21920
Official titleSurvey to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Risk Minimisation Measures for Atezolizumab Use in the European Union
Study title acronym
Study typeOther: HCP survey
Brief description of the studyThis is a multi-country, one-wave, cross-sectional physician survey to evaluate the effectiveness of additional Risk Minimisation Measures (aRMM) for atezolizumab use, covering receipt of, understanding and use, knowledge and behavior among physicians, and in particular aRMM effectiveness in informing physicians to recognize and manage immune-related adverse drug reactions (irADRs). The online survey questionnaire, comprising multiple-choice and true/false questions, will be conducted in several European countries where atezolizumab has been launched.
Was this study requested by a regulator?Yes: EMA
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
EU RMP category 3 (required)
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicable
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Centre to which the investigator belongsOXON
Department/Research groupOXON Epidemiology
Organisation/affiliationOXON Epidemiology Ltd.
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Dr
Last name Di Nucci
First name Flavia
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
No
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Multiple centres
In total how many centres are involved in this Study?300
Countries in which this study is being conducted
International study
Denmark
Germany
Italy
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed12/10/201812/10/2018
Start date of data collection29/04/201930/04/2019
Start date of data analysis
Date of interim report, if expected
Date of final study report06/07/202026/06/2020
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companiesF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd100
Charities
Government body
Research councils
EU funding scheme
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Di Nucci
First name Flavia
Address line 11 DNA way
Address line 2
Address line 3
CitySan Francisco
Postcode
CountryUnited States
Phone number (incl. country code)16502438101
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
Public Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name TISL
First name Trial Information Support Line
Address line 1F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
Address line 2Grenzacherstrasse 124
Address line 3
CityBasel
Postcode
CountrySwitzerland
Phone number (incl. country code)41616881111
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
6. Study drug(s) information
Single-Constituent (Substance INN)ATEZOLIZUMAB
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)No
8. Population under study
Age
Adults (18 - 44 years)
Adults (45 - 64 years)
Adults (65 - 74 years)
Adults (75 years and over)
Sex
Male
Female
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects300
Additional information
HCP survey, no patient recrutement
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?No
Sources of data
HCP survey
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Effectiveness evaluation
Primary scope : Effectiveness evaluation
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
The main objective of the study is to assess the receipt of the atezolizumab HCP Guide and Patient Alert Card (PAC) for the target physician population and to assess the level of knowledge of key messages related to Immune-related Adverse Drug Reactions (IrADRs) outlined in the atezolizumab HCP Guide and PAC.
Are there primary outcomes?Yes
Primary Outcomes are as follows:
- Percentage of respondents that report having received the HCP Guide and PAC.
- Percentage of respondents that correctly answered each knowledge sub-question. An individual physician score will be calculated as the proportion of all knowledge sub-questions with correct responses.
Are there secondary outcomes?Yes
Secondary Outcomes are as follows:
- Percentage of respondents that report having understood the HCP Guide.
- Percentage of respondents that report having read or used the HCP Guide and PAC.
- Percentage of respondents that correctly answered each behavior sub-question. An individual physician score will be calculated as the proportion of all behavior sub-questions with correct responses.
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Cross-sectional study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Not applicable/no follow-up
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
Statistical analyses will be mainly descriptive. Continuous variables will be described by their number (of valid cases, of missing values), mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum. Categorical variables will be described as the total number and relative percentage per category. Confidence intervals of 95% will be evaluated, when relevant. The number of missing data will be indicated. Since missing values are expected to be few and distributed at random, no replacement or imputation will be performed. Missing values will not be considered in the denominators for proportions. For physician questionnaire measures, results will be stratified by country and physician’s specialty. Results may be weighted according to the distribution of physicians in the general population by country and specialty.
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
18. Study Results
Not submitted
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Conflict(s) of interest of
investigator(s)Not submitted
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documentsNot
submitted
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Not submitted
