Status: Planned
First registered on:
10/11/2020
Last updated on:
10/11/2020
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS37983
Official titleComparative Effectiveness and Safety of Drugs used in Rare Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Study title acronymCAESAR
Study typeObservational study
Brief description of the studyCAESAR is an Italian multicenter retrospective cohort study on Rare Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative diseases (RND), based on information available in regional administrative healthcare databases. The aims are 1) to describe the prescriptive patterns of drugs used for the treatment of patients affected by RND and identify patient characteristics associated to these patterns in the three Italian regions (Tuscany, Umbria, Lazio), accounting for over 10 million residents; and 2) to perform a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of drugs used for the treatment of RND, with a focus on specific active agents. The study population will be enrolled in the period 2009-2019, with a two-year look-back and at least 1 year of follow-up, including patients, resident in one of the three regions and affected by Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA), Pseudobulbar palsy, Progressive bulbar palsy (PBP), Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), Other motor neuron disease, Myasthenia gravis (MG). Patients will be defined from Hospital discharge records (ICD-9-CM codes), disease specific copayment exemptions, and, as far as possible, disease specific drug treatments. Drug utilisation patterns will be based on drugs (ATC codes) prescribed to outpatients using the DDDs. Safety and effectiveness will be investigated using a new-user approach and applying both, intention-to-treat and as-treated analysis. Clinical data available in two of the participating regions for ALS patients will be used to 1) validate the algorithm used for patient identification, 2) validate the exposure definition, and 3) perform external adjustment. Data and analysis ill be managed through a common data model, with shared data scripts, performing the analysis at regional level (in-house) and pooling aggregated anonymous data to obtain overall results.
Was this study requested by a regulator?No
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
Not applicable
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicable
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Department/Research groupDepartment of Epidemiology
Organisation/affiliationLazio Regional Health Service
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Ms
Last name Kirchmayer
First name Ursula
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
No
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Multiple centres
In total how many centres are involved in this Study?8
National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
University of Florence, Neurofarba Department, Florence, Italy
Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Scarab Lab, Florence, Italy
Umbria Region, Regional Pharmacovigilance Center, Perugia, Italy
Umbria Region Perugia Hospital - Neuropathophysiology, Perugia, Italy
Countries in which this study is being conducted
National study
Italy
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed23/09/202023/09/2020
Start date of data collection01/03/2021
Start date of data analysis01/06/2021
Date of interim report, if expected25/10/2021
Date of final study report24/10/2022
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companies
Charities
Government bodyItalian Medicines Agency12
Research councils
EU funding scheme
OtherRegional Drug Departme88
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Ms
Last name Kirchmayer
First name Ursula
Address line 1Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112
Address line 2
Address line 3
CityRoma
Postcode00147
CountryItaly
Phone number (incl. country code)390699722160
Alternative phone number3999722129
Fax number (incl. country code)390699722111
Public Enquiries
Title Ms
Last name Kirchmayer
First name Ursula
Address line 1Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112
Address line 2
Address line 3
CityRoma
Postcode00147
CountryItaly
Phone number (incl. country code)390699722160
Alternative phone number3999722129
Fax number (incl. country code)390699722111
6. Study drug(s) information
Not applicable (disease/epidemiology study)
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)Yes
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA)
Pseudobulbar palsy
Progressive bulbar palsy (PBP)
Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS)
Other motor neuron disease
Myasthenia gravis (MG)
Additional Medical Condition(s)
Other RNDs might be included during the study
8. Population under study
Age
Term newborns (0-27 days)
Infants and toddlers (28 days - 23 months)
Children (2 - 11 years)
Adolescents (12 - 17 years)
Adults (18 - 44 years)
Adults (45 - 64 years)
Adults (65 - 74 years)
Adults (75 years and over)
Sex
Male
Female
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects5000
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?Yes
Data sources registered with ENCePP
Data sources not registered with ENCePP
Umbria regional administrative data, Italy
ALS registry, Italy
Sources of data
Disease/case registry
Administrative database, e.g. claims database
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Drug utilisation study
Effectiveness evaluation
Primary scope : Effectiveness evaluation
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
Objective 1. describe the prescriptive patterns of the study drugs in patients affected by RND and identify patient characteristics associated to these patterns in the three Italian regions (Tuscany, Umbria, Lazio), accounting for over 10 million residents.
Objective 2. comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of drugs used for the treatment of RND, with a focus on specific agents
Are there primary outcomes?Yes
Overall and cause specific mortality, Admission to intensive care unit, Remission from corticosteroid use, discontinuation after a period of prescriptions with corticosteroids for systemic use
Are there secondary outcomes?Yes
Adverse drug reactions (serious infections; autoimmune disease) - to be defined, Respiratory failure and tracheotomy (for ALS patients), Thymoma, thymectomy, myasthenia gravis crisis, use of intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis (for MG patients)
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Cohort study
Drug utilisation study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Yes
Please describe duration of follow up
for the CER study, patients will be followed from the day of first prescription of the study drug until the occurence of any of the following: study outcome, death, disenrolment, end of the study, (for the AT approach: discontinuation, switch)
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
Data will be organised and managed through a common data model. Analysis will be performed running the shared scripts at local level and pooling aggregated data at the end.
Drug utilization will be defined on the basis of DDDs, using different indicators: prevalence of use (by dividing the number of drug users by the overall resident population); prevalence of use among patients in the cohort (by disease for single drugs), DDDs per 1000 users per day (the mean number of doses consumed every day by 1000 patients included in the cohort).
CER will be performed through a propensity matched cohort design (head-to-head comparison between different drug groups/drugs). Patients in the compared exposure groups will be propensity matched. A group of patients not treated with any of the drugs will also be defined and compared.
Intention-to-treat and As-treated analyses will be performed using Cox proportional Hazard models (HRs and 95%CIs).
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
Available when the study ends
18. Study Results
Not submitted
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Conflict(s) of interest of
investigator(s)Not submitted
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documentsNot
submitted
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Not submitted
