Status: Finalised
First registered on:
04/02/2020
Last updated on:
11/11/2020
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS33461
Official titleStudy on the association of uterine perforation and intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion with breastfeeding status at the time of IUD insertion and postpartum timing of IUD insertion in electronic medical record databases. A postmarketing requirement for Mirena
Study title acronymAPEX IUD
Study typeObservational study
Brief description of the studyThis study is an US postmarketing requirement that investigates the outcomes of uterine perforation and intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion in association with breastfeeding, postpartum exposures and type of IUD.
The study aims to quantify the risk of uterine perforation and IUD expulsion in relation to the breastfeeding status and postpartum time (≤ 6 , > 6 ≤ 14, > 14, ≤ 52 or > 52 weeks postpartum, including women without a recorded delivery within the past 52 weeks) at the time of IUD insertion
This study will also assess the risk of both perforation and expulsion by type of IUD. The effect of IUD types (LNG-releasing vs. copper) on the association between perforation/ expulsion and breastfeeding status/ postpartum status, as well as the effect of breastfeeding status on the association between perforation and/or expulsion and postpartum status are also investigated.
Was this study requested by a regulator?Yes: United States
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
Non-EU RMP only
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicableCT.gov: NCT03754556
Bayer No.: 19682
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Centre to which the investigator belongsRTI-HS
Department/Research groupPharmacoepidemiology & Risk Management
Organisation/affiliationRTI Health Solutions
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Dr
Last name Bayer AG
First name Bayer Clinical Trials
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
No
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Multiple centres
In total how many centres are involved in this Study?4
Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA
Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, USA
Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, USA
Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, USA
Countries in which this study is being conducted
National study
United States
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed29/06/201629/06/2016
Start date of data collection01/12/201803/12/2018
Start date of data analysis
Date of interim report, if expected
Date of final study report30/04/202003/03/2020
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companiesBayer AG100
Charities
Government body
Research councils
EU funding scheme
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Bayer AG
First name Bayer Clinical Trials
Address line 1Muellerstrasse 178
Address line 2
Address line 3
CityBerlin
Postcode
CountryGermany
Phone number (incl. country code)49-30300139005
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
Public Enquiries
Title Dr
Last name Bayer AG
First name Bayer Clinical Trials
Address line 1Muellerstrasse 178
Address line 2
Address line 3
CityBerlin
Postcode
CountryGermany
Phone number (incl. country code)49-30300139005
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
6. Study drug(s) information
Substance class (ATC Code)G02BA03 (plastic IUD with progestogen)
Product NameMirena
CountryUnited States
Substance INN(s)LEVONORGESTREL
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)Yes
Uterine perforation
Additional Medical Condition(s)
IUD expelled
8. Population under study
Age
Adolescents (12 - 17 years)
Adults (18 - 44 years)
Adults (45 - 64 years)
Sex
Female
Other population
Pregnant women
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects225000
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?Yes
Data sources not registered with ENCePP
Kaiser Permanente Northern California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Southern California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Washington, United States
Regenstrief Institute, United States
Sources of data
Administrative database, e.g. claims database
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Risk assessment
Primary scope : Risk assessment
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
1. To compare the risk of uterine perforation among women who were breastfeeding versus women who were not breastfeeding at the time of first IUD insertion
2. To evaluate the risk of uterine perforation among women who had their first IUD insertion within different time periods postpartum, including women without a recorded delivery
Are there primary outcomes?Yes
Person-time at risk / Confirmed date of uterine perforation / Confirmed date of IUD-expulsion
Are there secondary outcomes?Yes
Incidence rate & Cumulative incidence rate of uterine perforation or IUD expulsion / Incidence of difficult IUD-insertion / Adjusted hazard ratio of uterine perforation or IUD-expulsion / Adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) & Adjusted incidence rate difference (IRD) of uterine perforation or IUD expulsion / Effect modification for uterine perforation or IUD expulsion
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Cohort study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Yes
Please describe duration of follow up
Until end of study
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
Descriptive analyses for all variables of interest will be presented overall and stratified by database. For categorical variables, frequencies and percentages will be presented for each level. For continuous variables, the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, median, and quartiles will be presented. For estimates, two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated.
Crude incidence rates and cumulative incidence of the outcomes will be estimated for each exposure group.
Crude hazard ratios will be calculated for each outcome without adjustment for covariates within each database. Confounding adjustment will be performed via overlap weighting. Adjusted hazard ratios will be calculated accounting for the propensity score–based weighting approach.
Effect estimates across datasources will be estimated. Analyses of the adjusted hazard ratios for the two primary objectives combined will include hypothesis testing using two-sided statistical test.
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
18. Study Results
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documentsNot
submitted
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Not submitted
