Status: Ongoing
First registered on:
30/01/2020
Last updated on:
30/01/2020
1. Study identification
EU PAS Register NumberEUPAS33214
Official titleThe comparative safety of first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for a multi-database real-world cohort study
Study title acronym
Study typeObservational study
Brief description of the studyWe studied the comparative safety of first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as prescribed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Drugs of interest were informed by a parallel drug utilisation study, and included methotrexate, hycroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide. Study outcomes included cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, stroke), infection/s (any, serious, opportunistic), cancer (any, lung, colo-rectal, leukemia, lymphoma) and leukopenia/pancytopenia.
Routine (real world) electronic medical records and/or claims data from Germany, Spain, Belgium, France, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Estonia, Japan, and the United States of America were analysed. All subjects aged 18+ , with 1+ year run-in, a diagnosis of RA, and a first-line csDMARD were included at therapy initiation. Propensity score stratification was used to minimise confounding by indication, and negative control outcomes analyses to identify residual (unobserved) confounding.
Was this study requested by a regulator?No
Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?
Not applicable
Regulatory procedure number (RMP Category 1 and 2 studies only)
Other study registration identification numbers and URLs as applicable
2. Research centres and Investigator details
Coordinating study entity
Centre nameCentre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford
Centre locationOxford, United Kinddom
Details of (Primary) lead investigator
Title Professor
Last name Prieto-Alhambra
First name Daniel
Is this study being carried out with the collaboration of a research network?
Yes
EHDEN
OHDSI
Other centres where this study is being conducted
Multiple centres
In total how many centres are involved in this Study?3
Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Countries in which this study is being conducted
International study
Belgium
Estonia
France
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Spain
United Kingdom
United States
3. Study timelines: initial administrative steps, progress reports and final report
PlannedActual
Date when funding contract was signed01/11/201801/11/2018
Start date of data collection01/01/200501/01/2005
Start date of data analysis13/01/202013/01/2020
Date of interim report, if expected
Date of final study report31/01/2020
4. Sources of funding
Please provide estimates of the percentage of funding by source for this study
Names(s)Approximate % funding
Pharmaceutical companies
Charities
Government body
Research councils
EU funding schemeIMI2 European Health Data and Evidence Network (EHDEN)100
5. Contact details for enquiries
Scientific Enquiries
Title Professor
Last name Prieto-Alhambra
First name Daniel
Address line 1Botnar Research Centre
Address line 2Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
Address line 3Windmill Road
CityOxford
PostcodeOX3 7LD
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)00441865223401
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
Public Enquiries
Title Professor
Last name Prieto-Alhambra
First name Daniel
Address line 1Botnar Research Centre
Address line 2Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
Address line 3Windmill Road
CityOxford
PostcodeOX3 7LD
CountryUnited Kingdom
Phone number (incl. country code)00441865223401
Alternative phone number
Fax number (incl. country code)
6. Study drug(s) information
Substance class (ATC Code)P01BA02 (hydroxychloroquine)
Substance class (ATC Code)L04AX03 (methotrexate)
Substance class (ATC Code)L04AA13 (leflunomide)
Substance class (ATC Code)A07EC01 (sulfasalazine)
7. Medical conditions to be studied
Medical condition(s)Yes
Rheumatoid arthritis
8. Population under study
Age
Adults (18 - 44 years)
Adults (45 - 64 years)
Adults (65 - 74 years)
Adults (75 years and over)
Sex
Male
Female
9. Number of subjects
Estimated total number of subjects300000
Additional information
N/A
10. Source of data
Is this study being carried out with an established data source?Yes
Data sources registered with ENCePP
Data sources not registered with ENCePP
CCAE, Optum, MDCR, MDCD, PanTher, IQVIA US Ambulatory EMR and IQVIA Hospital US Charge Master, United States
JMDC, Japan
Estonian healthcare data, Estonia
QVIA Disease Analyser Germany EMR, Germany
LPD Belgium EMR, Belgium
Sources of data
Administrative database, e.g. claims database
Routine primary care electronic patient registry
Pharmacy dispensing records
11. Scope of the study
What is the scope of the study?
Risk assessment
Primary scope : Risk assessment
12. Main objective(s)
What is the main objective of the study?
1. To assess the cardiovascular safety of MTX compared to LEF, HCQ, and SSZ
2. To estimate the risk of infections associated with the use of MTX compared to LEF, HCQ, and SSZ
3. To study the risk of cancer associated with the use of MTX compared to LEF, HCQ, and SSZ
4. To study the risk of leukopenia/pancytopaenia associated with the use of MTX compared to LEF, HCQ, and SSZ
Are there primary outcomes?Yes
Myocardial infarction, stroke, serious infection, opportunistic infection, any infection, lymphoma, leukemia, lung cancer, colo-rectal cancer, any cancer, leukopenia/pancytopenia
Are there secondary outcomes?No
13. Study design
What is the design of the study?
Cohort study
14. Follow-up of patients
Will patients be followed up?Yes
Please describe duration of follow up
Up to 5 years (real world, routinely collected data)
15. Data analysis plan
Please provide a brief summary of the analysis method
Propensity scores will be estimated using LASSO and used for stratification (primary) and matching (secondary analysis). Balance will be assessed using standardised mean difference. Cox models will be used to estimate hazard ratios according to exposure. Negative control outcomes will be used to assess residual confounding, and for calibration where applicable. Study diagnostics (power, propensity score distribution, covariate balance) were evaluated by clinicians and epidemiologists to determine which database-target-comparator-outcome-analyses warrant further consideration. Database-target-comparator that identified <10 outcomes in the time-at-risk or contained analyses with baseline covariate with standardized mean difference>0.1 and covariate prevalence difference>0.05 were excluded. All the analyses will be conducted for each database separately, with estimates combined in fixed effects meta-analysis methods where I2 is <=40%.
16. ENCePP seal
Are you requesting the ENCePP seal for this study?
No
17. Full protocol
18. Study Results
Not submitted
Please list the 5 most relevant publications using data from your study
ReferenceLink to web-publication
None
19. Other relevant documents
Conflict(s) of interest of
investigator(s)Not submitted
Composition of Steering Group and
ObserversNot submitted
Other documents
DescriptionDocumentLatest version
Signed Code of
Conduct Checklist
Not submitted
Signed Code of Conduct Declaration
Not submitted
Signed Checklist for Study
Protocols
Submitted
